Is it just me or is HRC doing some massively vague rationalizations?
TBG- ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
“When I left as secretary and passed the baton on to Secretary Kerry, we were positioned to really explore whether we had set the table well enough to see changes that were sufficient to meet our legitimate objections to Iran’s behavior and its future plans,” Clinton said, referring to her successor, John F. Kerry..Dafuq does this sentence even mean?
TBG- ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
5 comments:
Apparently there is an issue with "setting" the table, which tells me that foreign relations have devolved even further than negotiating with the North Koreans regarding the shape of the table, or something or other...that..which.
Oh hell. I don't fuqing know...
That she's lying through her teeth...
Translation: Let's see if we got enough stuff set in stone regarding Iran so that even Kerry can't fuq it up.
Yes.
It's just more Clintonia triple talk. She's desperately trying to keep the crapola coming out about Benghasi and every other foreign policy screw up by the Oabma Administration from screwing her chances of getting the Democratic nomination.
Post a Comment