Friday, September 16, 2011

Advancements in Health and Fashion



Dr. Calvin Rickson, a scientist from the University of Florida has invented a bra that keeps women's breasts from jiggling, bouncing up and down, and prevents the nipples from pushing through the fabric when cold weather sets in.


At a news conference, after announcing the invention, a large group of men took Dr. Rickson outside and kicked the shit out of him.

TBG- ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

4 comments:

Midwest Chick said...

That second one looks either very uncomfortable or like something one would wear to model for the cover of a Conan or John Carter of Mars book.

Unknown said...

now that is funny!

Home on the Range said...

Now it seems as though the Chinese, now, of all people, have figured out a way to measure boobs properly.

I read that researchers in Hong Kong have come up with a different mathematical equation which they say will produce shapelier outlines and greater comfort for Chinese women. If successful, their bra-sizing system could be adopted across the globe.

They say there are more than 100 key measurements necessary to produce the perfect fit, and bra sizes should be based on a new depth/width ratio - or DWR.
Writing in the International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University team says that a “woman’s breast is a very complex 3D geometry” and the existing sizing system may be “inappropriate in the categorisation of breast sizes for bras”.

This may be all very well, but I think it’s just technobabble for the oldest, and best measure of breast size: the ASH (American Standard Handful) which was shamefully replaced by the ABC method of the 1930s.

And let’s be honest, here: should we trust this new science, when it’s a well-known fact that Chinese women are not exactly renowned for their volumetric boobage?

B.

Cockroach said...

re: They say there are more than 100 key measurements necessary to produce the perfect fit, and bra sizes should be based on a new depth/width ratio - or DWR.

These were men measuring right? I think possibly they kept making up reasons to measuring again. And there's nothing wrong with that. Keep on with the research boy's.