Monday, June 08, 2009

Explanation Needed

Please go to www.recovery.gov and explain this:

Illinois: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $8,585,276

Washington: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $4,123,767

Oregon: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $3,837,579

California: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $10,652,033

Nevada: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $740,431

Arizona: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $3,199,456

Utah: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $1,776,702

Idaho: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $2,292,438

Montana: $0 dollars

Wyoming: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $857,718

Colorado: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $2,861,220

New Mexico 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawai$3,802,222

Texas: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $19,473,698

Oklahoma: 14.255 CDBG State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $4,333,265


TBG- ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

1 comment:

  1. Only lawyers and politicians can come up with names like that. In reading the names, it sounds like all those states were giving $M to Hawaii for something they weren't entitled to. I finally resorted to pasting part of the first line into google to find out WTF you were talking about. https://www.cfda.gov/index?s=program&mode=form&tab=step1&id=3aa4ef9688d55644ca097e393fb331d9&cck=1&au=&ck= It still reads like mud.

    The real question is whether Hazard County is getting any of those funds.

    But seriously, isn't this exactly the OPPOSITE of how our founding fathers designed our system? Everything should be done on a local level that CAN be, then on a State level, then on Federal. This allows individuals to have their voice heard. We've shifted to the Fed taking the tax money directly from everyone, then feeding it back down thru the system thereby making sure that no one's voice can be heard.

    Can anyone explain why the elected representatives from Colorado should be voting/deciding how much money should be sent to Putnam County in Florida? And why the taxpayers in Colorado should be paying money to that county? Because that is EXACTLY the way the system is currently happening.

    ReplyDelete

Tweaked the anti-spam settings a bit.
Let's see if this does the trick.